z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Peer review declaration
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/846/1/011003
Subject(s) - presentation (obstetrics) , declaration , publishing , peer review , library science , computer science , medical education , operations research , public relations , political science , medicine , engineering , law , radiology , programming language
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind (author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other) . • Criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining paper : There are four main criteria for a paper to be accepted by reviewers. It presents new insight on essential issues in the field and should draw the reader’s interest. The explanation of the methods is understandable, and its presentation should be practical. The reviewers reject paper that lacks novelty, contains defects in procedure and or data analysis, cannot be adequately understood, and fails in technical evaluation. For papers that reviewers accept with “major or minor revision” condition, there is an opportunity to resubmit articles after revision. However, the option is not available for a manuscript that reviewer has rejected. • Conference submission management system : The organizing committee used Open Conference System (OCS) by Public Knowledge Project (PKP) installed on the university’s server and hosted by the university’s research and innovation management office. • Number of submissions received: 76 • Number of submissions sent for review: 60 • Number of submissions accepted: 40 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.63 % • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 or 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: The similarity checking process using i-Thenticate is carried out before sending each paper to the reviewer. • Contact person for queries: Dr. Ratna Yuniati ( ratnayuniati@sci.ui.ac.id ) Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA), Universitas Indonesia

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here