Open AccessA coordination perspective on dialogue processes between planners and developers in a sustainable urban development project
Author(s) -
Niklas Törnå,
Sofia Lidelöw,
Lars Stehn
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.179
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/588/5/052055
Subject(s) - interdependence , sustainability , negotiation , process management , business , knowledge management , sustainable development , process (computing) , perspective (graphical) , urban planning , new product development , product (mathematics) , sociology , computer science , engineering , political science , marketing , ecology , social science , civil engineering , geometry , mathematics , artificial intelligence , law , biology , operating system
Several of Sweden’s Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) use developer dialogue processes between them and building actors to aid in the implementation of urban development projects. The idea is often to achieve ambitious local sustainability and to encourage a generally appreciated collaborative culture; however, processes of planners/developers interactions are challenging to manage in practice. In this study, we aim to depict and analyse a developer dialogue process used by a Swedish LPA in an on-going sustainable urban development project through the theoretical lens of organizational coordination mechanisms. Particular focus is placed on exploring how planners and develops interact while negotiating and implementing locally defined sustainability priorities. Empirical material was collected through document analysis, workshops and interviews with LPA representatives. Findings from the ongoing study indicates that the LPA manage a mixture of formal and informal interdependencies throughout in an attempt to achieve a greater fulfilment of their sustainability goals, and better outcomes in terms of product compliance. Furthermore, the use of coordination mechanisms for analysing the project seems to represent an important instrumental knowledge gap for better understanding sustainable urban development projects’ implementation and outcomes.