z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Research on two methods of atmospheric environmental impact assessment a case study of lead zinc smelter
Author(s) -
Li Li,
Miao Yu,
Xingjie Lin,
jingling Chu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.179
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/569/1/012032
Subject(s) - chimney (locomotive) , environmental science , pollutant , smelting , aermod , environmental impact assessment , environmental engineering , terrain , impact assessment , scrubber , meteorology , air pollution , engineering , geography , waste management , smoke , atmospheric dispersion modeling , metallurgy , ecology , chemistry , materials science , cartography , organic chemistry , public administration , political science , biology
Two methods of atmospheric environmental impact assessment for enterprises were discussed in this paper. One was the pollutant contribution rate assessment based on regional maximum value point and sensitive sites, the other was the global pollutant contribution rate assessment method based on all grids in the region. The emission contributions to the atmospheric SO 2 concentrations from the lead zinc smelting enterprise were simulated by AERMOD using 100m scale grids within 25 square kilometres in 2018. The results showed that the change of environmental benefits caused by the increase of chimney height presented different trends by using the two assessment method, and the regional assessment method was disturbed by the terrain factor. The further research should be doing in order to reflect the pollution diffusion of emission contributions better.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here