
Mechanism of migration and settlement for temporary plugging ball in shale gas horizontal wells
Author(s) -
Feng Zhou,
Kuidong Li,
Ji Xiao,
Wei Liu,
Yun Peng Hu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.179
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/546/4/042026
Subject(s) - geology , casing , discrete element method , mechanics , ball (mathematics) , geotechnical engineering , materials science , petrology , petroleum engineering , geometry , physics , mathematics
In order to determine the migration and settlement mechanism of temporary plugging balls in horizontal wells, the rules for distribution, migration and settlement of balls in different location were researched through calculation, coupling fracturing fluid and characteristics of movement based on CFD (computational fluid dynamics), DEM (discrete element method) and DDPM (dense discrete phase model), and the intensity, plane and spatial distribution of the microseismic events before and after ball-addition were analysed. The results showed that: First, the central flow core in the pipeline is the main migration carrier of the temporary plugging balls and proppants, low-viscosity liquid performs differences when inflowing at various perforation holes. The settlement and plugging in downstream cannot be effectively improved while the upstream without balls’ settlement. Second, due to the fluid resistance, the mean velocity of temporary plugging balls decreases and balls spread along the casing wall while the interaction force can be ignored. Under different displacement, the temporary plugging balls’ migration speed has a relatively stable value, the displacement of 5 m 3 /min is the critical value for the effective setting of temporary plugging balls. Thus, most of the micro-seismic events after ball-addition were concentrated in the upstream clusters, the impact scope of the micro-seismic events of 6-clusters is greater than that of 8-clusters perforation. After ball-addition in 6-clusters, the key effect is to improve the complexity of the microfracture network, while in 8-clusters to improve SRV (simulated reservoir volume) for the beginning first 4 clusters. So that is, increasing the number of clusters will lead to an inadequate microfracture length extension and only SRV (simulated reservoir volume) near the wellbore zone was improved.