z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in soils around mining area: comparison of different assessment methods
Author(s) -
Na Wang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.179
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/525/1/012074
Subject(s) - mercury (programming language) , environmental science , heavy metals , pollution , cadmium , mercury pollution , environmental chemistry , soil water , evaluation methods , soil test , mining engineering , soil science , chemistry , ecology , geology , engineering , computer science , biology , organic chemistry , reliability engineering , programming language
The farmland soil around the mercury mining area of Xunyang mansion was investigated and analyzed, and different methods were used to evaluate the soil. The results show that the contents of chromium, nickel, cadmium and mercury in Gongguan mercury mining area are 97-1113 mg / kg, 76-601 mg / kg, 0.415-1.458 mg / kg, 1.050-5.273 mg / kg, all of which exceed the standard values. The results show that the mercury pollution in Gongguan mercury mining area is extremely serious; the Nemero pollution index method shows that the soil near the Gongguan mercury mining area has been polluted in different degrees, and the crops near the mining area have the tendency to pollute heavy metals; the potential ecological risk index method shows that the heavy metal mercury in Gongguan mercury mining area presents a very strong risk level. The evaluation results of different evaluation methods are quite different. Therefore, in the follow-up evaluation, the appropriate evaluation method should be selected according to the purpose of evaluation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here