Open AccessComparative customer economics on different financial options in support the adoption of residential rooftop photovoltaic in Thailand
Author(s) -
Siripha Junlakarn,
Phimsupha Kokchang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012145
Subject(s) - photovoltaic system , business , payback period , finance , environmental economics , net metering , net present value , purchasing , cost of electricity by source , electricity , investment (military) , electricity generation , economics , production (economics) , renewable energy , engineering , electrical engineering , power (physics) , distributed generation , marketing , microeconomics , physics , quantum mechanics , politics , political science , law
The Thai Government has supported the use of solar photovoltaic systems for green electricity production toward the self-consumption policy since 2016. A photovoltaic support program with an installed capacity target of 100 Megawatt was announced in December 2018 to promote self-consumption and compensate for any excess photovoltaic generation at 1.68 Thai Baht/kilowatt-hour. However, the target was not achieved as a result of high upfront investment costs that are one of the main barriers in household application. To make solar photovoltaic systems more accessible to a larger group of users, financial mechanisms are required. The economic feasibility of financial options (cash, solar power purchasing agreement, solar leasing, solar loan) was analyzed for photovoltaic systems under the current Thai household solar rooftop scheme. The System Advisor Model, an open source techno-economic analysis tool, was employed to simulate photovoltaic production and cash flows to calculate the economic feasibility including the levelized cost of electricity, net present value, internal rate of return and payback period. Results showed that investment in a 3-kilowatt photovoltaic system with debt fraction of 50% and 100% cash was profitable, while investment in a 3-kilowatt photovoltaic system through a solar power purchasing agreement and leasing was not economically viable.