Open AccessPIV measurements on a Kaplan turbine and comparison with scale-adaptive numerical analysis
Author(s) -
J Beck,
Simon Joßberger,
Roland Jester-Zürker,
Stefan Riedelbauch
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.179
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/405/1/012024
Subject(s) - draft tube , turbine , particle image velocimetry , mechanics , turbulence , flow (mathematics) , computational fluid dynamics , reynolds averaged navier–stokes equations , diffuser (optics) , velocimetry , simulation , computer science , physics , engineering , mechanical engineering , optics , light source
Kaplan turbines build a mainstay of the hydro power generation as they offer best efficiency even for high flow conditions. A double regulating approach facilitates a high degree of flexibility but yields to be a sophisticated turbine type. Typical phenomena like gap flow and flow separation are challenges in simulation and complicate reliable predictions. To get a better understanding of flow physics elaborate numerical simulations by means of Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are conducted as well as experimental flow investigation using the non-intrusive optical measurement technique Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Measurements are taken at the spiral case inlet, the draft tube cone and the diffuser giving instantaneous or phase-locked time averaged vector fields of flow velocity in a plane. Depending on the optical access it is possible to gather the in-plane velocity components or all three velocity components using Stereoscopic PIV. The obtained measurement results are then taken as reference on the one hand side for a definition of realistic inlet boundary condition and on the other hand side for assessment of the chosen numerical approach for predicting flow phenomena in Kaplan turbines. In this particular case the focus is on the interaction of runner and draft tube. Results of unsteady simulations with standard two equation and advanced hybrid RANS-LES turbulence models are compared to measurement data.