z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to Comment on ‘Carbon intensity of corn ethanol in the United States: state of the science’
Author(s) -
Melissa J Scully,
Gregory A. Norris,
Tania M. Alarcon Falconi,
David L. MacIntosh
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
environmental research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.37
H-Index - 124
ISSN - 1748-9326
DOI - 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2e36
Subject(s) - greenhouse gas , corn ethanol , constructive , spawn (biology) , corn starch , environmental science , starch , biofuel , computer science , ethanol fuel , process (computing) , chemistry , food science , engineering , waste management , ecology , fishery , biology , operating system
Spawn-Lee et al published a comment on our recent paper, ‘Carbon intensity of corn ethanol in the United States: state of the science.’ Their commentary is critical of our methodology and conclusions regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) life cycle analyses (LCAs) for corn starch ethanol and gives particular attention to the estimation of emissions from land use change (LUC). Several of the concerns stated by Spawn-Lee et al were raised in prior publications and are addressed in the recently published literature, thus, we respond to those points in brief and refer readers to those papers for more information. In response to their remaining concerns, we present detailed information in support of our approach for assessing LCAs of corn starch ethanol and our findings. Our original paper and the corroborating information provided here demonstrate that our methods are robust and our results are credible. Further, we hope this response contributes to constructive discussion and research on estimation of GHG emissions and LUC linked to corn starch ethanol.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here