Open AccessCo-benefits of global, domestic, and sectoral greenhouse gas mitigation for US air quality and human health in 2050
Author(s) -
Yuqiang Zhang,
Steven J. Smith,
Jared H. Bowden,
Zachariah Adelman,
J. Jason West
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
environmental research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.37
H-Index - 124
ISSN - 1748-9326
DOI - 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f76
Subject(s) - greenhouse gas , air quality index , environmental science , natural resource economics , climate change , valuation (finance) , climate change mitigation , business , economics , geography , meteorology , finance , ecology , biology
Reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can bring ancillary benefits of improved air quality and reduced premature mortality, in addition to slowing climate change. Here we study the co-benefits of global and domestic GHG mitigation on US air quality and human health in 2050 at fine resolution using dynamical downscaling of meteorology and air quality from global simulations to the continental US, and quantify for the first time the co-benefits from foreign GHG mitigation. Relative to the reference scenario from which RCP4.5 was created, global GHG reductions in RCP4.5 avoid 16000 PM 2.5 -related all-cause deaths yr -1 (90% confidence interval, 11700-20300), and 8000 (3600-12400) O 3 -related respiratory deaths yr -1 in the US in 2050. Foreign GHG mitigation avoids 15% and 62% of PM 2.5 - and O 3 -related total avoided deaths, highlighting the importance of foreign mitigation for US health. GHG mitigation in the US residential sector brings the largest co-benefits for PM 2.5 -related deaths (21% of total domestic co-benefits), and industry for O 3 (17%). Monetized benefits for avoided deaths from ozone and PM 2.5 are $137 ($87-187) per ton CO 2 at high valuation and $45 ($29-62) at low valuation, of which 31% are from foreign GHG reductions. These benefits likely exceed the marginal cost of GHG reductions in 2050. The US gains significantly greater air quality and health co-benefits when its GHG emission reductions are concurrent with reductions in other nations. Similarly, previous studies estimating co-benefits locally or regionally may greatly underestimate the full co-benefits of coordinated global actions.