z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry
Author(s) -
Gareth Marks,
Jaryd R. Christie,
Kevin Jordan
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/2167/1/012015
Subject(s) - scanner , optics , trajectory , displacement (psychology) , geometry , imaging phantom , beam divergence , cone beam computed tomography , beam (structure) , line (geometry) , physics , materials science , mathematics , beam diameter , computed tomography , laser , medicine , psychology , astronomy , laser beams , psychotherapist , radiology
Measured trajectories of markers on vessel wall and beads on a plumb are compared with calculated trajectories for transmission images obtained with Vista16™ optical cone beam scanner. Effective pixel size was 0.11 mm. An algorithm was developed to measure trajectories for the plumb line phantom and a semi-automatic version was required for the gel filled vessels due to overlap of markers and seam projections at maximum lateral positions. It was found that for 15 cm diameter vessels, the vessel edge was not visible due to divergence in cone beam geometry. Accounting for this effect was necessary in order to remove artefacts from calculated vessel trajectory. Displacement differences were found to be less than 0.1 mm for the plumb line, 0.3 mm for a beads and 1 mm for markers on gel filled vessel. Minimization of the vessel marker trajectory deviation will provide a more accurate approach to refractive index optimization. No optical aberrations were detected from the trajectory analysis and manufacturer scanner alignment and geometrical calibrations were independently verified.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here