Open AccessInvestigation on Online DGA Monitoring to Determine Transformer Health Index Using Machine Learning
Author(s) -
M Solehin Shamsudin,
Fitri Yakub,
Mohd Ibrahim Shapiai,
Azlan Mohmad,
Nur Amirah Abd Hamid
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/2128/1/012024
Subject(s) - dissolved gas analysis , artificial neural network , transformer , support vector machine , artificial intelligence , machine learning , computer science , fuzzy logic , data mining , pattern recognition (psychology) , engineering , reliability engineering , transformer oil , voltage , electrical engineering
The Dissolve Gas Analysis (DGA) to determine the ageing and degradation of the transformer is standard and routine periodic maintenance. In general, there are two DGA analysis methods which are conventional (lab-based) and online monitoring. DGA monitoring will be able to access to detect incipient fault and transformer failure. Several techniques are available to analyse, interpret and diagnose the DGA result, such as IEEE standard, IEC 60599 standard, Key Gas Method, and Duval methods. There are several Machine Learning (ML) techniques has been explored such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), K-Neural Neighbours (KNN), Random Neural Network (RNN), and Fuzzy Logic for determining the transformer condition, including fault diagnostic and fault detection. However, there are unexplored studies to combine the commercial device to determine the Health Index (HI) of Transformer. In this study, an ML method with the available input feature from the commercial device to the network is trained to determine the HI. In general, the benchmark dataset from the existing work is employed to validate the proposed investigation. There are 730 datasets comprising five different classes; 1) Very Good, 2) Good, 3) Fair, 4) Poor, 5) Very Poor in determining the HI of a transformer. Conventional rule to partition the train and testing dataset with a 70:30 ratio is employed in this study. The maximum accuracy results and method for 1) M1 is 66.67% for ANN, 2) M2 is 68.49% for ANN, 3) M3 is 76.71% for KNN, 4) M5 is 76.26% for ANN, 5) M6 is 79.00% for ANN and 6) M7 is 86.30% for ANN. In conclusion, the multi-gas device will have a good accuracy performance and provide a good HI indicator to classify the condition of the transformer, which can be used for preventive maintenance.