Open AccessBuilding Structure Analysis With and Without Direct Foundation Modelling using Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame
Author(s) -
Jaka Propika,
Laras Laila Lestari,
Yanisfa Septiarsilia,
K N Julistian
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/2117/1/012012
Subject(s) - pile , structural engineering , foundation (evidence) , joint (building) , moment (physics) , context (archaeology) , spring (device) , geotechnical engineering , engineering , geology , physics , paleontology , history , archaeology , classical mechanics
The modelling of placement upon the seismic resistant structure can be carried out separately or directly. Separated modelling refers to the modelling using fixed joint, while direct modelling is defined as the lower structure directly using spring on soil-foundation interaction. Both modelling have differences in the context of behaviour and reaction of structure that must be adjusted based on SNI 1726:2019 and pile needs. This research analysed the calculation of static bearing capacity of pile and manual calculation of k coefficient by Nakazawa method and a supporting program SAP2000 V14.2.5. The analysis results indicated that under the manual calculation, total pile needs on fixed joint modelling of spun pile in diameter 600 mm class B are 185 piles within pile cap modelling at every point of column, meanwhile using SAP2000 V14.2.5, it is obtained the pile needs of spring modelling are 176 piles within integral pile cap modelling. The structural behaviour and the reaction of both modelling demonstrated the values of drift control, period, mass participation, static dynamic shear force, and force output in the fixed joint modelling were less than spring modelling.