Open Access
Peer review declaration
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/2008/1/011002
Subject(s) - presentation (obstetrics) , publishing , originality , clarity , declaration , quality (philosophy) , computer science , peer review , library science , excellence , medicine , political science , sociology , social science , qualitative research , law , biochemistry , chemistry , philosophy , epistemology , radiology , programming language
All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series (CLABIO 2021) have been peer reviewed through a processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were developed in a single-blind form, and conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Acceptance criteria related to scientific content, quality and presentation of the papers were: Technical Criteria.- Scientific merit, clarity of expression, sufficient discussion and suitable referencing. Quality Criteria.- Originality, motivation, repetition and suitable length. Presentation Criteria.- Title adequate and appropriate, abstract with essential information, clear diagrams, figures, tables, captions, text and mathematics. Conclusion carefully written summarizing novelty. • Conference submission management system: The conference submission management system used was EasyChair Ltd (Manchester, UK). Number of submissions received: The number of paper received was 22 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: • Number of submissions accepted: Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): All were send for review, one paper was rejected, thus the acceptance rate was 95% Average number of reviews per paper: The average number of reviewer per paper was 2, and a total number of 16 reviewers were involved. • Total number of reviewers involved: 16 • Any additional info on review process: Every paper submission was analyzed by a plagiarism check system and a similitude report was obtained, acceptance similitude rate was < 5%. In addition; an English review evidence was mandatory, review of language in grammar and style by a professional proof-reading service or native speaker English colleague (i.e. Invoice, receipt, professional letter, e-mail, etc). Final submission was updated with a “cover letter” for reviewer with explanation point by point how authors answered, corrected or modified every reviewer´s comments, as well as an “authors check list” format where authors check each point with assuring that their final version fulfils the format template requirements accordingly JPCS author guidelines for conference proceedings, in such format corresponding author was aware and signed the IOP proceedings license notice. Contact person for queries: César Antonio González Díaz Chair Program CLABIO 2021 Proceedings Editor Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México. cgonzalezd@ipn.mx