
Assessment of the Effects of Blockchain Based Protection in Network Performance
Author(s) -
Y. Murali Mohan Babu,
K. R. Radhika,
T. R. Saravanan,
J. K. Periasamy
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1964/4/042077
Subject(s) - blockchain , computer science , proof of work system , computer security , the internet , database transaction , peering , computer network , anonymity , cryptocurrency , internet privacy , world wide web , database
Blockchain is popular as the distributed directory under Blockchain, which safeguards the transaction history in a completely linked network of peers. For double-dollar secrecy, a Bitcoin transaction is only called irrevocable after it’s on the blockchain, a chain comprising at least six mined blocks — shortly, “six confirmations.” In addition to the usage of blockchain technologies for securing funding, the Internet of Things and the ad hoc vehicle network are now paired with other new technologies (VANET). Nevertheless, these modern apps could have relatively poor Internet access because of the integration of handheld devices that may be placed outside network networks. This paper discusses the influence of latency on forking actions by blockchain and potential breaches of the above six transaction acceptance confirmations convention. We simplify the data structure of blockchain and prevent detailed calculations needed for proof of operating to speed up our simulations (Pow). By simulating, we prove that the convention of six confirmations is vulnerable to the latency of the peer-to-peer system besides also illustrate how easy it is disrupted by simpler mine-mining problems. It is not shocking that the lateness of the underlying peer-to-peer network has seriously impacted the tempo at which all nodes converge in the blockchain. It is also seen to the degree nodes with more regular Internet access will benefit unfairly from proof-of-work mining benefits. We therefore propose to track fairness with heterogeneous latency profiles across nodes, which can prohibit any nodes from being miners.