Peer review declaration

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review : Double-blind • Conference submission management system : Firstly, authors send their papers to the email address of the conference. Secondly, all submissions go through a preliminary review to check the length, scope and plagiarism. Thirdly, all problematic papers rejected outright. Finally, the rest papers assigned to relevant reviewers. • Number of submissions received : 705 • Number of submissions sent for review : 619 • Number of submissions accepted : 298 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100) : 42.27% • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 158 • Any additional info on review process : The submission will first be reviewed for its topic and length, then go through an originality check. The peer-review process will begin soon after the paper is found to be qualified. The paper will be sent to have a double-blind peer review by 2 reviewers. They will judge the paper based on the theme, coverage, innovation, integrity, depth, and language. If the paper is accepted, notification of acceptance and review comments will be sent to the author via email. The actual review time may be different under certain situations. • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) Xia Huang Guilin Normal College huangxia@mail.glnc.edu.cn