z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Monte-Carlo simulation of the response of bare neutron counters at the South Pole to vertical secondary particles from cosmic rays
Author(s) -
Audcharapon Pagwhan,
A. Zingsheim,
Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
A. Sáiz,
P.S. Mangeard,
D. Ruffolo,
P. A. Evenson,
J. Madsen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1719/1/012008
Subject(s) - cosmic ray , neutron , nuclear physics , physics , monte carlo method , neutron detection , proportional counter , neutron flux , atmosphere (unit) , flux (metallurgy) , neutron monitor , neutron temperature , computational physics , detector , materials science , optics , meteorology , statistics , mathematics , metallurgy
Neutron monitors (NM64) are standard ground-based detectors that measure the flux of primary cosmic rays at GeV energies in space by counting secondary particles (mostly neutrons) from atmosphere cascades. The atmospheric neutrons are detected by induced nuclear fission in a gas proportional counter. In the standard design, there is a lead ring to generate evaporation neutrons that are moderated by polyethylene before being detected in the 10 BF 3 gas counter. By omitting the lead, so called “bare counters” respond to lower energy particles on average and can be used in conjunction with NM64 to estimate the energy spectrum of the primary cosmic rays. The specific objective of this research is to refine the understanding of the lead-free neutron monitor now installed at the South Pole using Monte-Carlo FLUKA simulations. This design uses paraffin and wood to moderate high-energy neutrons and detects them with 3 He gas-filled proportional counters. Latitude surveys have shown that they have different detection efficiency from either the NM64 or polyethylene moderated bare counters, but they have never been adequately modelled. Understanding the differences quantitatively is the goal of this work. We will also report the detection efficiency of the paraffin bare for other atmospheric particles.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here