z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of Gaussian wake models under different atmospheric stability conditions: Comparison with large eddy simulation results
Author(s) -
Maria Krutova,
Mostafa Bakhoday Paskyabi,
Finn Gunnar Nielsen,
Joachim Reuder
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1669/1/012016
Subject(s) - wake , turbine , large eddy simulation , turbulence , meteorology , gaussian , wind speed , wake turbulence , mechanics , environmental science , marine engineering , physics , aerospace engineering , engineering , quantum mechanics
The calculation of the velocity deficit in the wake of individual wind turbines is a fundamental part of the wind farm analysis. A good approximation of the wake deficit behind a single wind turbine will improve the power estimation for downwind turbines. Large-eddy simulation (LES) is a research tool widely used in studying the velocity deficit and turbulence intensity in the wake. However, the computational cost of the LES prevents its application in wind farm performance analysis and control. Existing analytical wake models provide a fast estimation of the velocity deficit and the wake expansion rate downstream from the rotor. The Gaussian wake models use a Gaussian distribution to improve the prediction of the wake velocity deficit. With the number of analytical models available, an extensive evaluation of their performance under different flow parameters is needed. In this work, we simulate a wake of a single wind turbine using the LES code PALM (Parallelized LES Model) combined with an actuator disc model with rotation. We compare the computed flow field with the predictions made by Gaussian models and fit their parameters to obtain the best possible fit for the wake field data as computed by LES.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here