Open AccessThe efforts of learning outcomes and motivation improvement through collaborative learning based on e-learning with course review horay on basic chemistry subject
Author(s) -
Enung Maria,
Sri Wilda Albeta,
R. Usman Rery,
Abdullah Abdullah,
Kamisah Osman
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042007
Subject(s) - cooperative learning , collaborative learning , experiential learning , active learning (machine learning) , learning cycle , psychology , team learning , educational technology , supporter , learning sciences , mathematics education , open learning , computer science , artificial intelligence , teaching method , archaeology , history
E-learning-based collaborative learning has proven to be an effective type of learning to improve student learning outcomes and motivation. However, the course review horay (CRH)is crucial to this learning as a supporter of learning. It is proved that E-learning-based collaborative learning with CRH not only improves learning outcomes and motivation but also shows the relationship between motivation and learning outcomes. The previous learning that did not use the CRH does not demonstrate the relationship between motivation and learning outcomes. This study applied 3 cycles which were conducted through lesson study. In Cycle I, the learning was performed by utilizing cooperative learning based on e-learning. After that, in Cycle II, the learning was performed by using collaborative learning based on e-learning. Furthermore, during Cycle III, the process of learning was conducted by utilizing a collaborative model based on e-learning with CRH. It was found that there was an improvement in learning outcomes before and after learning in each cycle. If it is compared, the motivation and learning outcomes in Cycle II were higher than those in Cycle I, and the motivation and learning outcomes in Cycle III were higher than they were in Cycle I and II.