Open AccessThe Comparison of Cooperative Learning Method of Rotating Trio Exchange Type and Think Pair Share Type
Author(s) -
Muhammad Gazali,
Ristu Haiban Hirzi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012058
Subject(s) - mathematics education , test (biology) , population , cooperative learning , mathematics , class (philosophy) , combinatorics , computer science , psychology , artificial intelligence , teaching method , demography , sociology , geology , paleontology
This study aimed to know which gave better learning outcomes between Rotating Trio Exchange (RTE) and Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning methods on student mathematics learning outcomes. This research used the experiment method. The population in this research was all VII grade students of MTs NW Ketangga Suela in the 2018/2019 school year. The technique of random sampling determined the research sample. Grade of VII-B of MTs NW Ketangga Suela as the experiment class, meanwhile VII-C grade of MTs NW Ketangga Suela as the experiment class 2. The research design used was Randomized Post test Only Comparison Group Design. Data collection technique used learning result test. The data were analyzed using the two-party t test with pollen variants method, Hypothesis results showed that th i t ung > t ta be l that was (4,513> 2,074) namely that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, So it could be concluded that there was a difference between the Rotating Trio Exchange (RTE) learning method and the Think Pair Share (TPS) method. Based on the average got, the Rotating Trio Exchange (RTE) method with an average of 77,661 had better learning achievement than the Think Pair Share (TPS) method with an average of 71,217.