Open AccessThe Implementation of Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Talk Write (TTW), and Problem Based Instruction (PBI) Learning Model on StudentS’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes
Author(s) -
Arie Purwa Kusuma,
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati,
Fredi Ganda Putra,
Santi Widyawati
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012065
Subject(s) - variance (accounting) , test (biology) , mathematics , computer science , mathematics education , paleontology , accounting , business , biology
This study aims to find out between TPS, TTW, or PBI learning models thatprovide the best learning outcomes. The research method used is quasi experimental. The data analysis technique used is the one-way variance analysis of equivalent cells. Based on the hypothetical test, it is obtained that F observed > F critical (4.12 > 3.114) which means H 0 is rejected. It can be concluded that the students’mathematics learning outcomes based on the application of TPS, TTW, and PBI learning models are not the same. Itcan be seen from the average score of each model that is 72.60 for TPS, 78.45 for TTW, and 65.19 for PBI. It appears that the average scoreof the TTW model is the highest among the rest, and the average score of the TPS model is higher than the PBI model. It can be said that the TTW model provides better mathematics learning outcomes than the TPS and the PBI model and the TPS model provides better mathematics learning outcomes than the PBI model. In short, the TTW Learning model is the most effective to be used in learning the circle material.