Open AccessContent validity of conation assessment
Author(s) -
Nanda Muliana,
Andi Ulfa Tenri Pada,
Cut Nurmaliah
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012057
Subject(s) - content validity , clarity , psychology , scale (ratio) , criterion validity , content (measure theory) , applied psychology , psychometrics , mathematics , construct validity , clinical psychology , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
Content validity reflects the representation and relevance of a set of items used to measure a concept carried out through rational analysis of the contents of the test through expert judgment. This validity refers to the accuracy of the measurement based on the contents of the instrument to ensure that the scale items used have met the overall concept content or suitability of the items. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of the contents of the Conation-Based Instrument in High School Biology Learning and explain the procedure for calculating the coefficient values of each instrument item. Five experts validated the instrument in this study consisting of three biology education experts and two psychology experts. The assessment criteria assessed were based on construction and clarity, which are assessed on a 4-point scale. Data collection was carried out using the Aiken V. formula. The result, from 39 items, which had a content validity coefficient greater than 0.87 (26 items) and the rest (12 items) were discarded.