Open AccessAnalysis of the Use of Thesis Guidance Information System Using the Technology Acceptance Model
Author(s) -
Priyanto Priyanto,
Agriansyah Ramadhan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1413/1/012038
Subject(s) - usability , likert scale , technology acceptance model , psychology , quality (philosophy) , service quality , scale (ratio) , information technology , data collection , information quality , information system , positive attitude , applied psychology , positive relationship , social psychology , service (business) , marketing , computer science , engineering , statistics , mathematics , business , developmental psychology , philosophy , operating system , epistemology , quantum mechanics , physics , human–computer interaction , electrical engineering
This study analyzes the implementation of thesis guidance information system named SIBIMTA for students of Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. This study was classified as correlational research with a quantitative approach. Data were collected from from 161 respondents in Faculty of Engineering who were working on their theses. Data collection techniques used a questionnaire with 32 questions. Data were taken using the Likert scale with 4 alternative options. The results of the study were: (1) the system quality had a positive effect on perceived usefulness; (2) the system quality had a positive effect on perceived ease-of-use; (3) the information quality had a positive effect on perceived usefulness; (4) information quality had a positive effect on perceived ease of use; (5) service quality had a positive effect on perceived usefulness; (6) service quality had a positive effect on perceived ease of use; (7) the perceived ease of use had a positive effect on perceived usefulness; (8) perceived ease of use had a positive effect on attitudes toward using a new technology; (9) perceived usefulness had a positive effect on attitudes toward using a new technology; (10) the perceived usefulness did not have a positive effect on the intention to use the new technology; (11) the attitude of using technology had a positive effect on the intention to use the new technology; (12) intention to use the new technology had a positive effect on actual use.