Open AccessIs there anything wrong? The inconsistency of argument with the table of truth
Author(s) -
Darmadi Darmadi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1265/1/012003
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , argument (complex analysis) , focus (optics) , mathematics education , set (abstract data type) , character (mathematics) , process (computing) , epistemology , cognition , psychology , table (database) , computer science , mathematics , philosophy , data mining , chemistry , biochemistry , physics , geometry , neuroscience , optics , programming language , operating system
The main character of the materials of mathematics is consistent. A problem emerged and became the focus of the research is obtained an inconsistency in mathematics. Research methods used are qualitative research methods. Data were taken with the use of interview-based tests and observation. The research results showed that: 1) there is an inconsistency in argumentation learning logic and mathematical set; 2) Inconsistency argument inspection results occur because of difference in taking for example; and 3) Lecture need to pay attention to the machining process of the students. As a result, in the study of cognitive conflicts can be happen in students and lecturers.