Open AccessEffects of Inflow Spatiotemporal Discretization on Wake Meandering and Turbine Structural Response using FAST.Farm
Author(s) -
Kelsey Shaler,
Jason Jonkman,
Nicholas Hamilton
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012023
Subject(s) - wake , inflow , turbine , discretization , multiphysics , wind speed , wind power , environmental science , computer science , marine engineering , meteorology , geology , mathematics , mechanics , physics , finite element method , engineering , structural engineering , aerospace engineering , mathematical analysis , electrical engineering
FAST.Farm is a newly developed multiphysics, midfidelity engineering tool that can be used to predict turbine power and structural loads of wind turbines in a wind farm with minimal computational expense. Previous studies have shown similarities and differences in wind turbine performance between FAST.Farm and high-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) using both LES precursor-generated inflow and TurbSim-generated synthetic inflow. While conservative resolutions have been used to date, no formal spatial or temporal discretization study has been performed for the FAST.Farm model wind domains. This work aims to study the effects of varying the spatial and temporal discretization of the wind domains on wake meandering (low-resolution domain) and turbine structural response (high-resolution domains) and resulting wake and load calculations. The purpose of this study is to establish convergence criteria and recommendations for discretization values in terms of rotor diameter (D, expressed in meters) that will maximize computational efficiency. To ensure a percent error of ≤ 1% in standard deviation of wake center position relative to the finest included resolution, a low-resolution time step of 0.024 D s, 0.016 D s, and 0.0079 D s and a low-resolution spatial discretization of 0.079 D m, 0.16 D m, and 0.24 D m is recommended for 8 m/s, 12 m/s, and 18 m/s mean ambient wind speed at hub height, respectively. These guidelines are likely applicable to other implementations of the dynamic wake meandering model. To ensure a percent error of ≤ 1% in standard deviation of all considered structural response outputs, a high-resolution time step that captures the highest influential excitation and natural frequencies in the system and a high-resolution spatial discretization comparable to the maximum airfoil cord length is recommended. These guidelines are likely applicable to any aeroelastic analysis.