Open AccessNumerical experiments of flux difference splitting methods with high resolution scheme for supersonic flows
Author(s) -
Uttam Singh Rajput,
Krishna M. Singh
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of physics. conference series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1742-6596
pISSN - 1742-6588
DOI - 10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012020
Subject(s) - supersonic speed , mathematics , shock (circulatory) , compressible flow , solver , shock wave , flow (mathematics) , spurious relationship , choked flow , mechanics , mathematical analysis , compressibility , geometry , physics , mathematical optimization , medicine , statistics
In this work, we have carried out the assessment of a high resolution scheme for unsteady compressible flow. For high order spatial accuracy, we have used fifth order weighted essentially non oscillatory (WENO) scheme. This scheme is applied to four flux difference splitting (FDS) methods: Harten-Lax-van-Leer (HLL), Roe solver, Harten-Lax-van Leer-Contact (HLLC), and Rusanov methods. We have compared results of these flux schemes with each other. WENO scheme is used for the reconstruction of left and right state variable across the cell interface for high resolution. The reconstruction procedure is performed in terms of primitive variables instead of conservative variable, in order to avoid spurious oscillation. We have considered two test cases: shock wave reflection and supersonic viscous flow over a flat plate, to access the performance of FDS schemes. An explicit third order TVD Runge-Kutta method is used for advancement of solution in time. The present results are compared with available numerical solutions. WENO-HLLC has good shock capturing capabilities as compare to WENO-Roe, WENO-HLL and WENO-Rusanov methods. It also provides best results inside and outside the boundary layer.