z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Optimizing calibration settings for accurate water equivalent path length assessment using flat panel proton radiography
Author(s) -
Carmen Seller Oria,
Gabriel Guterres Marmitt,
Jeffrey Free,
Johannes A. Langendijk,
Stefan Both,
Antje Knopf,
Artūrs Meijers
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
physics in medicine and biology/physics in medicine and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1361-6560
pISSN - 0031-9155
DOI - 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2c4f
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , calibration , proton therapy , path length , proton , standard deviation , nuclear medicine , range (aeronautics) , detector , materials science , physics , mathematics , optics , nuclear physics , statistics , medicine , composite material
Objective: Proton range uncertainties can compromise the effectiveness of proton therapy treatments. Water equivalent path length (WEPL) assessment by flat panel detector proton radiography (FP-PR) can provide means of range uncertainty detection. Since WEPL accuracy intrinsically relies on the FP-PR calibration parameters, the purpose of this study is to establish an optimal calibration procedure that ensures high accuracy of WEPL measurements. To that end, several calibration settings were investigated. Approach: FP-PR calibration datasets were obtained simulating PR fields with different proton energies, directed towards water-equivalent material slabs of increasing thickness. The parameters investigated were the spacing between energy layers (Δ E ) and the increment in thickness of the water-equivalent material slabs (Δ X ) used for calibration. 30 calibrations were simulated, as a result of combining Δ E  = 9, 7, 5, 3, 1 MeV and Δ X  = 10, 8, 5, 3, 2, 1 mm. FP-PRs through a CIRS electron density phantom were simulated, and WEPL images corresponding to each calibration were obtained. Ground truth WEPL values were provided by range probing multi-layer ionization chamber simulations on each insert of the phantom. Relative WEPL errors between FP-PR simulations and ground truth were calculated for each insert. Mean relative WEPL errors and standard deviations across all inserts were computed for WEPL images obtained with each calibration. Main results: Large mean and standard deviations were found in WEPL images obtained with large Δ E values (Δ E  = 9 or 7 MeV), for any Δ X . WEPL images obtained with Δ E  ≤ 5 MeV and Δ X  ≤ 5 mm resulted in a WEPL accuracy with mean values within ±0.5% and standard deviations around 1%. Significance: An optimal FP calibration in the framework of this study was established, characterized by 3 MeV ≤ Δ E  ≤ 5 MeV and 2 mm ≤ Δ X  ≤ 5 mm. Within these boundaries, highly accurate WEPL acquisitions using FP-PR are feasible and practical, holding the potential to assist future online range verification quality control procedures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here