
Principal component analysis for fast and model-free denoising of multi b-value diffusion-weighted MR images
Author(s) -
Oliver J. GurneyChampion,
David J. Collins,
Andreas Wetscherek,
Mihaela Rata,
Remy Klaassen,
Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven,
Kevin J. Harrington,
Uwe Oelfke,
Matthew Orton
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
physics in medicine and biology/physics in medicine and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.312
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1361-6560
pISSN - 0031-9155
DOI - 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1786
Subject(s) - noise reduction , principal component analysis , artificial intelligence , kurtosis , pattern recognition (psychology) , voxel , weighting , noise (video) , diffusion mri , computer science , mathematics , computer vision , image (mathematics) , statistics , magnetic resonance imaging , medicine , radiology
Despite the utility of tumour characterisation using quantitative parameter maps from multi- b -value diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), clinicians often prefer the use of the image with highest diffusion-weighting ( b -value), for instance for defining regions of interest (ROIs). However, these images are typically degraded by noise, as they do not utilize the information from the full acquisition. We present a principal component analysis (PCA) approach for model-free denoising of DWI data. PCA-denoising was compared to synthetic MRI, where a diffusion model is fitted for each voxel and a denoised image at a given b -value is generated from the model fit. A quantitative comparison of systematic and random errors was performed on data simulated using several diffusion models (mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis). A qualitative visual comparison was also performed for in vivo images in six healthy volunteers and three pancreatic cancer patients. In simulations, the reduction in random errors from PCA-denoising was substantial (up to 55%) and similar to synthetic MRI (up to 53%). Model-based synthetic MRI denoising resulted in substantial (up to 29% of signal) systematic errors, whereas PCA-denoising was able to denoise without introducing systematic errors (less than 2%). In vivo , the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sharpness of PCA-denoised images were superior to synthetic MRI, resulting in clearer tumour boundaries. In the presence of motion, PCA-denoising did not cause image blurring, unlike image averaging or synthetic MRI. Multi- b -value MRI can be denoised model-free with our PCA-denoising strategy that reduces noise to a level similar to synthetic MRI, but without introducing systematic errors associated with the synthetic MRI method.