z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Inhomogeneous field calibration of a magneto-optical indicator film device
Author(s) -
Manuela Gerken,
S. Sievers,
H. W. Schumacher
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
measurement science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.48
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1361-6501
pISSN - 0957-0233
DOI - 10.1088/1361-6501/ab816e
Subject(s) - calibration , magnetometer , magnetic field , demagnetizing field , characterization (materials science) , optics , materials science , image resolution , magnet , electromagnet , field (mathematics) , hall effect sensor , physics , magnetization , mathematics , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics
A concept for the traceable calibration of magneto-optical indicator film (MOIF) based magnetic field imaging devices is presented and discussed for the example of a commercial MOIF device with a 60 × 45 mm 2 sensor. The calibration facilitates a quantitative and fast characterization of magnetic microstructures combining relatively high spatial resolution with large imaging areas. The macroscopic calibration is performed using the homogeneous magnetic stray field of a pre-characterized electromagnet with a large pole shoe diameter of 250 mm. However, this calibration alone cannot yet account for the vectorial and spatially fast decaying stray fields of magnetic microstructures. For that, a forward simulation approach is pursued, based on the temperature-dependent magnetic parameters of the MOIF material as resulting from superconducting quantum interference device magnetometry and ferromagnetic resonance measurements. This is complemented by a transfer function-based approach to correct the impact of the sensor thickness and in-plane stray field components. The validity of the combined calibration and simulation approach is proven by means of a quantitative characterization of a magnetic scale. For the commercial MOIF device a 28.4 µm spatial resolution and 1.18 mT field resolution is achieved. The calibration is validated by a comparison to scanning Hall probe microscopy results. Furthermore, the uncertainty budget is discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here