Interim Performance Feedback in Multistage Tournaments: The Optimality of Partial Disclosure
Author(s) -
Maria Goltsman,
Arijit Mukherjee
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of labor economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 8.184
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1537-5307
pISSN - 0734-306X
DOI - 10.1086/656669
Subject(s) - interim , incentive , tournament , promotion (chess) , full disclosure , microeconomics , economics , business , labour economics , computer science , law , computer security , political science , mathematics , combinatorics , politics
Workers competing in a tournament for a prize (e.g., a promotion) often perform sequentially in multiple stages. When the firm is privately informed about the workers’ performance, it can sharpen incentives by strategically disclosing the intermediate results. But the policies that enhance final-stage effort may dampen incentives at the intermediate stage. In our model, the optimal disclosure policy has a simple form: disclose only if all workers perform poorly. This result offers a novel justification for partial disclosure in performance feedback. Also, it contrasts with the existing literature that focuses on the extreme policies of full disclosure and no disclosure.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom