Employee Crime and the Monitoring Puzzle
Author(s) -
William T. Dickens,
Lawrence F. Katz,
Kevin Lang,
Lawrence H. Summers
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
journal of labor economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 8.184
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1537-5307
pISSN - 0734-306X
DOI - 10.1086/298211
Subject(s) - payment , punishment (psychology) , profit (economics) , business , labour economics , economics , microeconomics , finance , psychology , social psychology
The simplest economic theories of crime predict that profit-maximizing firms should follow strategies of minimal monitoring with large penalties for employee crime. We investigate possible reasons why firms actually spend considerable resources trying to detect employee malfeasance. We find that the most plausible explanations for firms' large outlays on monitoring of employees-legal restrictions on penalty clauses in contracts and the adverse impact of harsh punishment schemes on worker morale-are also consistent with the payment of premium (rent-generating) wages by cost-minimizing firms.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom