Premium
Comparison of Two Trap Net Sizes for Collecting Walleye Broodstock
Author(s) -
Blackwell Brian G.,
Kaufman Todd M.,
Moos Tyrel S.,
Lucchesi David O.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
north american journal of aquaculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.432
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1548-8454
pISSN - 1522-2055
DOI - 10.1080/15222055.2014.982335
Subject(s) - broodstock , trap (plumbing) , fishery , biology , zoology , fish <actinopterygii> , physics , aquaculture , meteorology
Trap nets are commonly used to collect Walleye Sander vitreus broodstock for spawning as part of culture and stocking programs. We compared overnight catch rates of Walleyes captured in two trap net sizes (small [0.9‐ × 1.5‐m frame, 0.9‐m‐diameter hoop, single throat, 0.9‐ × 15.2‐m lead, 19‐mm knotted mesh] and large [1.5‐ × 1.8‐m frame, 1.5‐m‐diameter hoop, double throated, 1.5‐ × 30.5‐m lead, 19‐mm knotless mesh]) to determine the relative efficiency of each size for broodstock collection. Sampling was completed during the spring of 2013 and 2014 soon after ice‐out at three waters in South Dakota. In all but two cases, total Walleye CPUE in large trap nets was significantly higher than that in small trap nets. However, length‐frequency distributions between the two net sizes generally were similar. The use of large trap nets will result in higher numbers of broodstock collected than with the smaller nets, likely offsetting the additional labor required to deploy and retrieve the larger traps.