Premium
Evolutionary analysis of fructose 2,6‐bisphosphate metabolism
Author(s) -
Michels Paul A. M.,
Rigden Daniel J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
iubmb life
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.132
H-Index - 113
eISSN - 1521-6551
pISSN - 1521-6543
DOI - 10.1080/15216540600688280
Subject(s) - phosphofructokinase 2 , biology , fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase , biochemistry , phosphofructokinase , gene , enzyme , fructose 2,6 bisphosphate , isozyme , phylogenetics , glycolysis , genetics , lineage (genetic)
Fructose 2,6‐bisphosphate is a potent metabolic regulator in eukaryotic organisms; it affects the activity of key enzymes of the glycolytic and gluconeogenic pathways. The enzymes responsible for its synthesis and hydrolysis, 6‐phosphofructo‐2‐kinase (PFK‐2) and fructose‐2,6‐bisphosphatase (FBPase‐2) are present in representatives of all major eukaryotic taxa. Results from a bioinformatics analysis of genome databases suggest that very early in evolution, in a common ancestor of all extant eukaryotes, distinct genes encoding PFK‐2 and FBPase‐2, or related enzymes with broader substrate specificity, fused resulting in a bifunctional enzyme both domains of which had, or later acquired, specificity for fructose 2,6‐bisphosphate. Subsequently, in different phylogenetic lineages duplications of the gene of the bifunctional enzyme occurred, allowing the development of distinct isoenzymes for expression in different tissues, at specific developmental stages or under different nutritional conditions. Independently in different lineages of many unicellular eukaryotes one of the domains of the different PFK‐2/FBPase‐2 isoforms has undergone substitutions of critical catalytic residues, or deletions rendering some enzymes monofunctional. In a considerable number of other unicellular eukaryotes, mainly parasitic organisms, the enzyme seems to have been lost altogether. Besides the catalytic core, the PFK‐2/FBPase‐2 has often N‐ and C‐terminal extensions which show little sequence conservation. The N‐terminal extension in particular can vary considerably in length, and seems to have acquired motifs which, in a lineage‐specific manner, may be responsible for regulation of catalytic activities, by phosphorylation or ligand binding, or for mediating protein‐protein interactions.IUBMB Life, 58: 133 ‐ 141, 2006