Premium
Therapists' views of the relative benefits and pitfalls of group work and one‐to‐one counselling for bereavement
Author(s) -
Vlasto Christopher
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
counselling and psychotherapy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1746-1405
pISSN - 1473-3145
DOI - 10.1080/14733140903171220
Subject(s) - loneliness , psychology , spouse , perception , psychotherapist , intervention (counseling) , social work , group work , social psychology , grounded theory , clinical psychology , applied psychology , qualitative research , pedagogy , psychiatry , social science , neuroscience , sociology , anthropology , economics , economic growth
Aim : To explore therapists' perceptions of the relative benefits and pitfalls of group work and individual counselling for bereaved clients. Method : Semi‐structured interviews with nine experienced bereavement therapists from a range of different contexts generated data which was analysed using grounded theory methodology. Findings : Groups were perceived as having a normalising influence, helping members make new social contacts and practice social skills. Individual counselling was seen as facilitating the initial telling of the story and the expression of extreme emotion. Discussion : The findings suggest that individual counselling may be useful as a primary intervention easing ‘emotional loneliness’ caused by the death of a spouse or attachment figure. Group work may be of more benefit later in the bereavement process, facilitating an engagement with the outside world and alleviating ‘social loneliness’. Implications for practice : This suggests that bereavement services might usefully combine group and individual provision. Initial assessment could help clients clarify their needs and facilitate their choice of service. This would be more cost effective and potentially ease clients' bereavement experience.