Premium
The experiences of therapists using a new client‐centred psychometric instrument, PSYCHLOPS (Psychological Outcome Profiles)
Author(s) -
Ashworth Mark,
Robinson Susan I.,
Godfrey Emma,
Parmentier Henk,
Shepherd Melanie,
Christey Jeremy,
Wright Kevin,
Matthews Veronica
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
counselling and psychotherapy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1746-1405
pISSN - 1473-3145
DOI - 10.1080/14733140512331343886
Subject(s) - outcome (game theory) , psychology , measure (data warehouse) , applied psychology , patient reported outcome , psychotherapist , qualitative research , clinical psychology , computer science , quality of life (healthcare) , data mining , social science , mathematics , mathematical economics , sociology
PSYCHLOPS (‘Psychological Outcome Profiles’) is a newly developed client‐generated psychometric instrument which can be used as an outcome measure. Uniquely, it asks clients to state their own problems, in their own words. As part of its validation, we used it alongside an existing measure, CORE‐OM (‘Clinical Outcomes Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure’). Based on a qualitative methodology, we report here on the first‐hand experiences of four therapists using both instruments. The key themes that emerged from therapists’ responses were feasibility, validity and usefulness. Both questionnaires were perceived as complementing each other, the qualitative information from PSYCHLOPS balancing the quantitative information from CORE‐OM and that both could contribute to the therapist‐client interaction. The key features of PSYCHLOPS are likely to prove attractive to therapists and should increase acceptance and uptake of outcome measures.