Premium
Variability in Sublingual Microvessel Density and Flow Measurements in Healthy Volunteers
Author(s) -
HUBBLE SHEENA M. A.,
KYTE HAYLEY L.,
GOODING KIM,
SHORE ANGELA C.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
microcirculation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.793
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1549-8719
pISSN - 1073-9688
DOI - 10.1080/10739680802461935
Subject(s) - reproducibility , microvessel , biomedical engineering , capillary action , nuclear medicine , blood flow , medicine , population , perfusion , materials science , mathematics , angiogenesis , radiology , statistics , composite material , environmental health
Objectives: As sublingual microvascular indices are increasingly heralded as new resuscitation end‐points, better population data are required to power clinical studies. This paper describes improved methods to quantify sublingual microvessel flow and density in images obtained by sidestream dark field (SDF) technology in healthy volunteers, including vessels under 10 μm in diameter. Materials and Methods: Measurements of sublingual capillary density and flow were obtained by recording three 15‐second images in 20 healthy volunteeers over three days. Two independent observers quantified capillary density by using two methods: total vessel length (mm/mm 2 ) and counting (number/mm). Both intraoral and temporal variabilities within subject and observer reproducibilities were determined by using coefficients of variability and reproducibility indices. Results: For small (1–10 μm), medium (11–20 μm), and large (21–50 μm) diameter, mean vessel density with standard deviations (SDs) in volunteers was 21.3(±4.9), 5.2 (±1.2), and 2.7 (±0.9) mm/mm 2 , respectively. Also, 94.0±1.4% of small vessels, 94.5±1.4% of medium vessels, and 94.5±4.0% of large vessels had continuous perfusion. Within subjects, the means of all measurements over three days varied less than 13, 22, and 35% in small, medium, and large vessels, respectively. Interobserver reproducibility was good, especially for capillary (1–10 μm) density and flow measurements. Conclusions: Our methods of microvessel flow and density quantification have low observer variability and confirm the stability of microcirculatory measurements over time. These results facilitate the development of SDF‐acquired sublingual microvascular indices as feasible microperfusion markers in shock resuscitation.