Premium
Research to practice—formal dissemination of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP) in Australia
Author(s) -
MCBRIDE NYANDA T.,
FARRINGDON FIONA H.,
KENNEDY CAROL A.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
drug and alcohol review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.018
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1465-3362
pISSN - 0959-5236
DOI - 10.1080/09595230701613510
Subject(s) - harm reduction , dissemination , government (linguistics) , harm , medical education , presentation (obstetrics) , information dissemination , intervention (counseling) , medicine , psychology , practice research , public relations , political science , nursing , public health , social psychology , linguistics , philosophy , world wide web , computer science , humanities , law , radiology
and Aims . This paper discusses the formal dissemination of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (National SHAHRP Dissemination Project) in Australia. The original SHAHRP research programme (SHAHRP study) was assessed previously for effectiveness during a longitudinal research study which followed the student participants over 32 months post‐intervention. The SHAHRP study focused on evaluating the behavioural impact of the programme and the results indicated that wider dissemination would be of value. Design and Methods . The National SHAHRP Dissemination Project involved key decision makers of drug education in the Government, Catholic and Independent schools sectors, in targeted states, agreeing to disseminate the SHAHRP Project through teacher educators and teachers in their sector and regions. Process, reach and project satisfaction were assessed. Results . The Dissemination Project conducted two workshops for 35 teacher educators. Fifteen teacher educators subsequently conducted 21 workshops for teachers between August 2003 and June 2004. One hundred and seventy schools and nearly 300 (294) teachers were involved in this training. Discussion and Conclusions . The advantages and barriers of researcher‐led dissemination, as illustrated in this study, suggest that methods other than publication in scientific journals and presentation at conferences may be useful for the transfer of effective intervention research programmes to practice. There may be some benefit to identifying and testing other research‐initiated pathways leading to evidence‐based policy and practice which, in combination with practitioner‐led transfer, can help to bridge the gap between research and practice in the future.