z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using total plasma triacylglycerol to assess hepatic de novo lipogenesis as an alternative to VLDL triacylglycerol
Author(s) -
Leanne Hodson,
Siôn A Parry,
Thomas Cornfield,
Catriona Charlton,
Wee Suan Low,
Charlotte Green,
Fredrik Rosqvist
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
upsala journal of medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.808
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 2000-1967
pISSN - 0300-9734
DOI - 10.1080/03009734.2020.1739789
Subject(s) - medicine , repeatability , lipogenesis , very low density lipoprotein , endocrinology , triglyceride , cholesterol , lipoprotein , chromatography , lipid metabolism , chemistry
Background: Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) is ideally measured in very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triacylglycerol (TAG). In the fasting state, the majority of plasma TAG typically represents VLDL-TAG; however, the merits of measuring DNL in total plasma TAG have not been assessed. This study aimed to assess the performance of DNL measured in VLDL-TAG (DNL VLDL-TAG ) compared to that measured in total plasma TAG (DNL Plasma-TAG ). Methods: Using deuterated water, newly synthesised palmitate was determined in fasting plasma VLDL-TAG and total TAG in 63 subjects taking part in multiple studies resulting in n  = 123 assessments of DNL (%new palmitate of total palmitate). Subjects were split into tertiles to investigate if DNL Plasma-TAG could correctly classify subjects having 'high' (top tertile) and 'low' (bottom tertile) DNL. Repeatability was assessed in a subgroup ( n  = 16) with repeat visits. Results: DNL VLDL-TAG was 6.8% (IQR 3.6-10.7%) and DNL Plasma-TAG was 7.5% (IQR 4.0%-11.0%), and the correlation between the methods was r s = 0.62 ( p  < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated similar performance (mean difference 0.81%, p  = 0.09); however, the agreement interval was wide (-9.6% to 11.2%). Compared to DNL VLDL-TAG , 54% of subjects with low DNL were correctly classified, whilst 66% of subjects with high DNL were correctly classified using DNL Plasma-TAG . Repeatability was acceptable (i.e. not different) at the group level, but the majority of subjects had an intra-individual variability over 25%. Conclusion: DNL in total plasma TAG performed similarly to DNL in VLDL-TAG at the group level, but there was large variability at the individual level. We suggest that plasma TAG could be useful for comparing DNL between groups.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here