
Using total plasma triacylglycerol to assess hepatic de novo lipogenesis as an alternative to VLDL triacylglycerol
Author(s) -
Leanne Hodson,
Siôn A Parry,
Thomas Cornfield,
Catriona Charlton,
Wee Suan Low,
Charlotte Green,
Fredrik Rosqvist
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
upsala journal of medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.808
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 2000-1967
pISSN - 0300-9734
DOI - 10.1080/03009734.2020.1739789
Subject(s) - medicine , repeatability , lipogenesis , very low density lipoprotein , endocrinology , triglyceride , cholesterol , lipoprotein , chromatography , lipid metabolism , chemistry
Background: Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) is ideally measured in very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triacylglycerol (TAG). In the fasting state, the majority of plasma TAG typically represents VLDL-TAG; however, the merits of measuring DNL in total plasma TAG have not been assessed. This study aimed to assess the performance of DNL measured in VLDL-TAG (DNL VLDL-TAG ) compared to that measured in total plasma TAG (DNL Plasma-TAG ). Methods: Using deuterated water, newly synthesised palmitate was determined in fasting plasma VLDL-TAG and total TAG in 63 subjects taking part in multiple studies resulting in n = 123 assessments of DNL (%new palmitate of total palmitate). Subjects were split into tertiles to investigate if DNL Plasma-TAG could correctly classify subjects having 'high' (top tertile) and 'low' (bottom tertile) DNL. Repeatability was assessed in a subgroup ( n = 16) with repeat visits. Results: DNL VLDL-TAG was 6.8% (IQR 3.6-10.7%) and DNL Plasma-TAG was 7.5% (IQR 4.0%-11.0%), and the correlation between the methods was r s = 0.62 ( p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated similar performance (mean difference 0.81%, p = 0.09); however, the agreement interval was wide (-9.6% to 11.2%). Compared to DNL VLDL-TAG , 54% of subjects with low DNL were correctly classified, whilst 66% of subjects with high DNL were correctly classified using DNL Plasma-TAG . Repeatability was acceptable (i.e. not different) at the group level, but the majority of subjects had an intra-individual variability over 25%. Conclusion: DNL in total plasma TAG performed similarly to DNL in VLDL-TAG at the group level, but there was large variability at the individual level. We suggest that plasma TAG could be useful for comparing DNL between groups.