Premium
Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement: Teachers’ views
Author(s) -
Connolly Stephen,
Klenowski Valentina,
WyattSmith Claire Maree
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
british educational research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.171
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1469-3518
pISSN - 0141-1926
DOI - 10.1080/01411926.2011.569006
Subject(s) - moderation , judgement , consistency (knowledge bases) , psychology , context (archaeology) , curriculum , perception , pedagogy , social psychology , empirical research , mathematics education , political science , computer science , paleontology , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , law , biology , philosophy , epistemology
Major curriculum and assessment reforms in Australia have generated research interest in issues related to standards, teacher judgement and moderation. This article is based on one related inquiry of a large‐scale Australian Research Council Linkage project conducted in Queensland. This qualitative study analysed interview data to identify teachers’ views on standards and moderation as a means to achieving consistency of teacher judgement. A complementary aspect of the research involved a blind review that was conducted to determine the degree of teacher consistency without the experience of moderation. Empirical evidence was gained that most teachers, of the total interviewed, articulated a positive attitude towards the use of standards in moderation and perceived that this process produces consistency in teachers’ judgements. Context was identified as an important influential factor in teachers’ judgements and it was concluded that teachers’ assessment beliefs, attitudes and practices impact on their perceptions of the value of moderation practice and the extent to which consistency can be achieved.