Constructivist, Problem-Based Learning Does Work: A Meta-Analysis of Curricular Comparisons Involving a Single Medical School
Author(s) -
Henk G. Schmidt,
Henk T. van der Molen,
Wilco W. R. te Winkel,
Wynand Wijnen
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
educational psychologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.856
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 1532-6985
pISSN - 0046-1520
DOI - 10.1080/00461520903213592
Subject(s) - curriculum , psychology , interpersonal communication , constructivist teaching methods , quality (philosophy) , variance (accounting) , mathematics education , teaching method , pedagogy , social psychology , philosophy , accounting , epistemology , business
Effects of problem-based learning as reported in curricular comparison studies have been shown to be inconsistent over different medical schools. Therefore, we decided to summarize effects of a single well-established problem-based curriculum rather than to add up sometimes-conflicting findings from different problem-based curricula. Effect sizes were computed for 270 comparisons. The results suggest that students and graduates from the particular curriculum perform much better in the area of interpersonal skills, and with regard to practical medical skills. In addition, they consistently rate the quality of the curriculum as higher. Moreover, fewer students drop out, and those surviving need less time to graduate. Differences with respect to medical knowledge and diagnostic reasoning were on average positive but small. These outcomes are at variance with expectations voiced in recent contributions to the literature. They demonstrate that constructivist curricula can have positive effects on learning even if they deemphasize direct instruction.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom