Premium
Ontogeny of the Ponzo illusion: Effects of age, schooling, and environment (1)
Author(s) -
Wagner Daniel A.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
international journal of psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1464-066X
pISSN - 0020-7594
DOI - 10.1080/00207597708247386
Subject(s) - illusion , psychology , perception , developmental psychology , experiential learning , social psychology , perspective (graphical) , humanities , cognitive psychology , philosophy , mathematics education , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , computer science
Subjects were 384 Moroccan males (age range 6–22 yrs.), divided into 16 equal groups, according to the factorial design: age (4) × schooling (2) × environment (2). Subjects were tested on four Ponzo configurations (differing in contextual information) from Leibowitz et al . (1969), the Ponzo perspective stimulus from Segall et al . (1966), the CEFT from Witkin et al . (1971), and a measure of pictorial depth perception. Individual measures of contact with mass‐media and urban life were collected on each subject. Analyses indicated that all main factors of age, schooling, and environment played important, and differing, roles in inducing illusion susceptibility. Piaget's (1969) theory of primary and secondary illusions was found useful in understanding the results of the Ponzo configurations used in the study. Primary illusion configurations were found to be relatively insensitive to experiential variables, and illusion susceptibility decreased with chronological age. In contrast, secondary illusion configurations were affected by many experiential factors, and illusion susceptibility was mediated through perceptual development and pictorial depth perception rather than chronological age. It was concluded that single‐factor theories of ontogenetic change in illusion susceptibility were inadequate to explain the complex interactions found in this study.