Premium
Coding Gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Population Genetics of Nonnative Brook Trout: The Ghost of Introductions Past
Author(s) -
Neville H. M.,
Bernatchez L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
transactions of the american fisheries society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.696
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1548-8659
pISSN - 0002-8487
DOI - 10.1080/00028487.2013.793613
Subject(s) - hatchery , biology , trout , genetic diversity , salvelinus , population , nucleotide diversity , genetic structure , genetic variation , effective population size , ecology , zoology , evolutionary biology , fishery , genetics , genotype , gene , haplotype , fish <actinopterygii> , demography , sociology
Fish have been translocated throughout the world, and introductions often have been executed repeatedly and have used mixtures of different strains from the native range. This history might have contributed to their invasive potential by allowing introduced and invading populations to circumvent expected reductions in genetic diversity from founder effects in a scenario termed the “genetic paradox” of invasions. We characterize patterns of genetic diversity in nonnative Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis , which have been introduced across the western United States for over a century but have also invaded broadly and pose a primary threat to native trout. We analyzed 155 coding gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 34 nonnative Brook Trout populations sampled across eight large river systems as well as samples from the only four hatchery strains with documented use in Idaho. We uncovered similar within‐population genetic diversity and large effective population sizes in naturalized populations compared with hatchery samples. Naturalized populations also showed substantial genetic structuring (maximum pairwise F ST = 0.23) across and even within watersheds and indicated suggestions of admixture in certain regions. Assignment probabilities confirmed two main hatcheries as the origin of most fish collected in the field; however, the four hatcheries were excluded as being the origin for 8% of individuals, mirroring results from clustering analyses and suggesting the influence of an additional unsampled hatchery source or sources. Simulated admixtures of hatchery samples produced genetic patterns similar to those observed in field samples, further supporting an influence of multiple historic hatchery stocks on the contemporary genetic structure of Brook Trout in Idaho. Our study highlights the potential contribution of historic hatchery and introduction practices in creating genetically variable and structured naturalized Brook Trout populations across Idaho, which may have allowed these fish to defy the “genetic paradox” early on in their nonnative history and set the stage for successful establishment and subsequent invasion.