z-logo
Premium
Simulation Study of Biological Reference Points for Summer Flounder
Author(s) -
Rothschild Brian J.,
Jiao Yue,
Hyun SaangYoon
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
transactions of the american fisheries society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.696
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1548-8659
pISSN - 0002-8487
DOI - 10.1080/00028487.2012.667041
Subject(s) - maximum sustainable yield , fishing , stock (firearms) , flounder , stock assessment , mathematics , fishery , econometrics , statistics , population , fisheries management , economics , geography , biology , fish <actinopterygii> , demography , archaeology , sociology
The biological reference point F x % (i.e., the fishing mortality rate that maintains the spawning stock biomass per recruit at x % of its unfished value [where x is usually set to 40]) is a commonly used proxy for F MSY (the fishing mortality rate that results in the maximum sustainable yield). However, F x % is not in general equivalent to F MSY . To investigate the difference between F x % and F MSY , we developed a simple simulation model capable of representing the relationship between yield and fishing mortality, maximum spawning potential (%MSP), and the curvature of the stock–recruitment (S–R) curve (parameterized as β ) for a stock similar to summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus (a high‐ β species). The model demonstrates that the dynamic trajectories of the stock are heavily dependent on β . The model confirmed the dependence of equilibrium yield on β and produced a specific relationship between the magnitude of β and yield. A decision‐theoretic approach was used to suggest that setting x to 40 reduces yield and that smaller values of x produce greater yields for high‐ β stocks. The analysis focuses attention on the fact that the choice of F x % as a management tool places extreme reliance on the least known and understood component of fish population dynamics: the S–R relationship. Our conclusion (to use a value of x considerably less than 40 to obtain MSY) was supported by (1) our simulation results, (2) averaging in a decision‐theoretic approach, (3) the correspondence of the traditionally computed biomass at the maximum sustainable yield with high values of β , and (4) the values of x reported in the literature.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom