z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Uterine rupture and perinatal outcome
Author(s) -
WIDÉN PETTERSSON KATARINA,
GRUNEWALD CHARLOTTA,
THOMASSEN PETER
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1080/00016340701662209
Subject(s) - medicine , uterine rupture , laparotomy , obstetrics , incidence (geometry) , retrospective cohort study , apgar score , pregnancy , gestational age , caesarean section , gynecology , pediatrics , surgery , uterus , physics , biology , optics , genetics
Background. In view of the increasing number of caesarean sections (CS), we wanted to investigate the clinical aspects of uterine rupture including perinatal outcome. Methods. A retrospective investigation of 24,181 deliveries at Stockholm South General Hospital between 1999 and 2004. Patient notes from cases with ICD‐codes 0710 and 0711 were studied together with charts from previous deliveries and neonatal data from the Paediatric Department. Results. Some 22 cases of uterine rupture were found, giving an incidence of 0.9 per 1,000 deliveries. In all cases, the diagnosis was confirmed at laparotomy. In 19/22 cases, the rupture occurred in patients with a previous uterine scar, 18 of whom were delivered at term and one at 16 gestational weeks. One case of intrauterine fetal death was noted. Of the remaining 20 newborns, 9 had a 5‐min Apgar ≤7, one died after 3 days, and one had neurological sequele at follow‐up. The remaining 18 newborns were healthy at discharge and up to 1 year of age. Conclusions. A previous uterine scar was the single most obvious risk factor. A positive finding was the relatively low risk of long‐term post‐asphyctic sequele in the newborns.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here