Open AccessIdentifying hazardous alcohol consumption during pregnancy: implementing a research‐based model in real life
Author(s) -
Göransson Mona,
Magnusson Åsa,
Heilig Markus
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1080/00016340600589677
Subject(s) - medicine , audit , intervention (counseling) , context (archaeology) , pregnancy , binge drinking , alcohol consumption , randomized controlled trial , family medicine , medical emergency , psychiatry , poison control , alcohol , suicide prevention , surgery , paleontology , biochemistry , genetics , chemistry , management , economics , biology
Aims . It has been repeatedly demonstrated that hazardous alcohol use during pregnancy is rarely detected in regular antenatal care, and that detection can be markedly improved using systematic screening. A major challenge is to translate research‐based strategies into regular antenatal care. Here, we examined whether a screening strategy using the Alcohol Use Disorder Test (AUDIT) and time‐line follow‐back (TLFB) could be implemented under naturalistic conditions and within available resources; and whether it would improve detection to the extent previously shown in a research context. Methods . Regular midwives at a large antenatal care clinic were randomized to receive brief training and then implement AUDIT and TLFB (“intervention”); or to a waiting‐list control group continuing to deliver regular care (“control”). In the intervention‐condition, AUDIT was used to collect data about alcohol use during the year preceding pregnancy, and TLFB to assess actual consumption during the first trimester. Data were collected from new admissions over 6 months. Results . Drop out was higher among patients of the intervention group than control midwives, 14% (23/162) versus 0% (0/153), and p <0.0001. A one‐day training session combined with continuous expert support was sufficient to implement systematic screening with AUDIT and TLFB largely within resources of regular antenatal care. The use of these instruments identified patients with hazardous consumption during the year preceding pregnancy i.e. AUDIT score 6 or higher (17%, 23/139), and patients with ongoing consumption exceeding 70 g/week and/or binge consumption according to TLFB (17%, 24/139), to a significantly higher degree than regular antenatal screening (0/162). The AUDIT‐ and TLFB‐positive populations overlapped partially, with 36/139 subjects screening positive with either of the instrument and 11/139 were positive for both. Conclusions . We confirm previous findings that alcohol use during pregnancy is more extensive in Sweden than has generally been realized. Systematic screening using AUDIT and TLFB detects hazardous use in a manner which regular antenatal care does not. This remains true under naturalistic conditions, following minimal training of regular antenatal care staff, and can be achieved with minimal resources. The proposed strategy appears attractive for broad implementation.