Open AccessHysterectomy and incontinence: a study from the Swedish national register for gynecological surgery
Author(s) -
Ellström Engh Marie A.,
Otterlind Lena,
Stjerndahl JanHenrik,
Löfgren Mats
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1080/00016340600555942
Subject(s) - medicine , hysterectomy , urinary incontinence , endometrial ablation , stress incontinence , abdominal hysterectomy , gynecology , population , gynecological surgery , obstetrics , surgery , general surgery , environmental health
Background. Hysterectomy is one factor that has been suggested to be a risk factor for developing stress incontinence. In Sweden, with a population of 8.86 million, a national register was set up in 1997 in order to have data for assessing the quality of gynecological surgery for benign disorders. Methods. Data in the Swedish national register for gynecological surgery during the period 1997–2002 were investigated. Surgical methods compared during this time period were: total hysterectomy (abdominal/laparoscopic, n =198/116), subtotal hysterectomy (abdominal/laparoscopic, n =163/86), and total hysterectomy (vaginal/laparoscopic assisted vaginal, n =265/7). Patients who underwent endometrial destruction (endometrial ablation, endometrial balloon treatment, n =187) were used as a control group. Only patients with no preoperative complaints were included. Outcome measures were answers to subjective questions asked pre‐ and postoperatively regarding urinary problems and incontinence. Results. De novo symptoms of stress incontinence, urgency and urgency incontinence, and/or mixed incontinence were noted in all groups. No differences were found among the groups. Conclusion. Factors other than hysterectomy should be discussed causing stress incontinence in women.