z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing methods for statistical inference with model uncertainty
Author(s) -
Anupreet Porwal,
Adrian E. Raftery
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.2120737119
Subject(s) - statistical inference , computer science , statistical model , prediction interval , inference , interval estimation , point estimation , frequentist inference , range (aeronautics) , bayesian probability , bayesian inference , machine learning , artificial intelligence , data mining , predictive inference , fiducial inference , statistics , mathematics , confidence interval , engineering , aerospace engineering
Significance Choosing a statistical model and accounting for uncertainty about this choice are important parts of the scientific process and are required for common statistical tasks such as parameter estimation, interval estimation, statistical inference, point prediction, and interval prediction. A canonical example is the choice of variables in a linear regression model. Many ways of doing this have been proposed, including Bayesian and penalized regression methods, and it is not clear which are best. We compare 21 popular methods via an extensive simulation study based on a wide range of real datasets. We found that three adaptive Bayesian model averaging methods performed best across all the statistical tasks and that two of these were also among the most computationally efficient.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom