z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Toward a genome sequence for every animal: Where are we now?
Author(s) -
Scott Hotaling,
Joanna L. Kelley,
Paul B. Frandsen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.2109019118
Subject(s) - genome , tree of life (biology) , biology , evolutionary biology , genbank , genomics , clade , annotation , genome project , genetics , data science , phylogenetics , gene , computer science
In less than 25 y, the field of animal genome science has transformed from a discipline seeking its first glimpses into genome sequences across the Tree of Life to a global enterprise with ambitions to sequence genomes for all of Earth’s eukaryotic diversity [H. A. Lewinet al. ,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 4325–4333 (2018)]. As the field rapidly moves forward, it is important to take stock of the progress that has been made to best inform the discipline’s future. In this Perspective, we provide a contemporary, quantitative overview of animal genome sequencing. We identified the best available genome assemblies in GenBank, the world’s most extensive genetic database, for 3,278 unique animal species across 24 phyla. We assessed taxonomic representation, assembly quality, and annotation status for major clades. We show that while tremendous taxonomic progress has occurred, stark disparities in genomic representation exist, highlighted by a systemic overrepresentation of vertebrates and underrepresentation of arthropods. In terms of assembly quality, long-read sequencing has dramatically improved contiguity, whereas gene annotations are available for just 34.3% of taxa. Furthermore, we show that animal genome science has diversified in recent years with an ever-expanding pool of researchers participating. However, the field still appears to be dominated by institutions in the Global North, which have been listed as the submitting institution for 77% of all assemblies. We conclude by offering recommendations for improving genomic resource availability and research value while also broadening global representation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here