Prediction of arrhythmia susceptibility through mathematical modeling and machine learning
Author(s) -
Meera Varshneya,
Xueyan Mei,
Eric A. Sobie
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
proceedings of the national academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.011
H-Index - 771
eISSN - 1091-6490
pISSN - 0027-8424
DOI - 10.1073/pnas.2104019118
Subject(s) - qt interval , computer science , metric (unit) , population , ventricular action potential , waveform , cardiac arrhythmia , machine learning , artificial intelligence , cardiology , medicine , electrophysiology , repolarization , atrial fibrillation , engineering , operations management , environmental health , telecommunications , radar
At present, the QT interval on the electrocardiographic (ECG) waveform is the most common metric for assessing an individual's susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias, with a long QT, or, at the cellular level, a long action potential duration (APD) considered high risk. However, the limitations of this simple approach have long been recognized. Here, we sought to improve prediction of arrhythmia susceptibility by combining mechanistic mathematical modeling with machine learning (ML). Simulations with a model of the ventricular myocyte were performed to develop a large heterogenous population of cardiomyocytes ( n = 10,586), and we tested each variant's ability to withstand three arrhythmogenic triggers: 1) block of the rapid delayed rectifier potassium current (I Kr Block), 2) augmentation of the L-type calcium current (I CaL Increase), and 3) injection of inward current (Current Injection). Eight ML algorithms were trained to predict, based on simulated AP features in preperturbed cells, whether each cell would develop arrhythmic dynamics in response to each trigger. We found that APD can accurately predict how cells respond to the simple Current Injection trigger but cannot effectively predict the response to I Kr Block or I CaL Increase. ML predictive performance could be improved by incorporating additional AP features and simulations of additional experimental protocols. Importantly, we discovered that the most relevant features and experimental protocols were trigger specific, which shed light on the mechanisms that promoted arrhythmia formation in response to the triggers. Overall, our quantitative approach provides a means to understand and predict differences between individuals in arrhythmia susceptibility.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom