Premium
Cancer screening education: can it change knowledge and attitudes among culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Queensland, Australia?
Author(s) -
Cullerton Katherine,
Gallegos Danielle,
Ashley Ella,
Do Hong,
Voloschenko Anna,
Fleming MaryLou,
Ramsey Rebecca,
Gould Trish
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
health promotion journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.515
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 2201-1617
pISSN - 1036-1073
DOI - 10.1071/he15116
Subject(s) - medicine , cancer screening , vietnamese , family medicine , cervical cancer , cancer , population , samoan , ethnic group , pacific islanders , cancer prevention , environmental health , philosophy , linguistics , sociology , anthropology
Issue addressed Screening for cancer of the cervix, breast and bowel can reduce morbidity and mortality. Low participation rates in cancer screening have been identified among migrant communities internationally. Attempting to improve low rates of cancer screening, the Ethnic Communities Council of Queensland developed a pilot Cancer Screening Education Program for breast, bowel and cervical cancer. This study determines the impact of education sessions on knowledge, attitudes and intentions to participate in screening for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities living in Brisbane, Queensland. Methods Seven CALD groups (Arabic‐speaking, Bosnian, South Asian (including Indian and Bhutanese), Samoan and Pacific Island, Spanish‐speaking, Sudanese and Vietnamese) participated in a culturally‐tailored cancer screening education pilot program that was developed using the Health Belief Model. A pre‐ and post‐education evaluation session measured changes in knowledge, attitudes and intention related to breast, bowel and cervical cancer and screening. The evaluation focussed on perceived susceptibility, perceived seriousness and the target population's beliefs about reducing risk by cancer screening. Results There were 159 participants in the three cancer screening education sessions. Overall participants' knowledge increased, some attitudes toward participation in cancer screening became more positive and intent to participate in future screening increased (n = 146). Conclusion These results indicate the importance of developing screening approaches that address the barriers to participation among CALD communities and that a culturally‐tailored education program is effective in improving knowledge, attitudes about and intentions to participate in cancer screening. So what? It is important that culturally‐tailored programs are developed in conjunction with communities to improve health outcomes.