Premium
Punching loan sharks on the nose: effective interventions to reduce financial hardship in New Zealand
Author(s) -
Signal Louise,
Lanumata Tolotea,
Bowers Sharron
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
health promotion journal of australia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.515
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 2201-1617
pISSN - 1036-1073
DOI - 10.1071/he12108
Subject(s) - loan , psychological intervention , financial literacy , finance , business , best practice , economics , medicine , management , psychiatry
Issues addressed Growth in the high‐cost, unregulated fringe lender market (with these lenders commonly referred to as loan sharks) has occurred both internationally and in New Zealand in recent years. The credit practices of loan sharks create financial hardship for many people including Mori, Pacific and low‐income New Zealanders. This paper reports on research that explored strategies for reducing the impact of the fringe lender market on Mori, Pacific and low‐income New Zealanders. Methods A narrative literature review and 10 key informant interviews were conducted to provide information on how best to intervene to reduce the impact of the fringe lender market for these people. Results The main interventions identified were: two regulatory approaches, one for capping interest rates and another to create codes of responsible lending; access to safe affordable micro‐finance options; financial literacy education; and Pacific cultural change around fa'alavelave, which are the ‘obligations’ of giving. Conclusions Protecting consumers from the unsafe practices of fringe lenders requires a combined approach of discouraging the undesirable practices of fringe lenders through regulation and encouraging the growth of safe, affordable micro‐finance options. Financial literacy education is a valuable activity for directing consumer attention to the safest options, but in isolation will have limited effect if options are limited. Health promoters have a valuable role to play in implementing these interventions. So what? The interventions identified in this work are likely to increase the protection of the most vulnerable people in New Zealand and leave them less indebted and with potentially more money available to spend on food, shelter and other essentials of life.